We welcome you to take part in the PUBMET2022 conference, which strives to present and discuss the plurality of approaches to scholarly communication, scholarly publishing and assessment (metrics). The conference will be held from 15 to 16 September 2022 with a pre-conference day on 14 September 2022 scheduled for workshops. The conference will present innovative approaches, best practice discussions and take on future challenges. The organizers aim to maintain lively discussion among experts from various fields involved in scholarly publishing and dissemination of knowledge. The field of scholarly communication, scholarly publishing and research assessment includes all disciplines and a variety of skills: researchers from different disciplines, information specialists and librarians, editors, publishers, teachers, students, policy makers, communication specialists, repository managers and university administrators.
This year’s conference topics are focused, but not limited to recent challenges in scholarly communication:
- Redesigning Open Access – Rights retention strategies and alternatives to paid OA
- Raising efficiency and effectiveness in scholarly communication
- Fairness of Open Science
- Potentials of public engagement in science and environmental activism
- Assessing the quality of research process, research outputs and publication channels
- Media visibility as a driver of scientific and social impact
All topics will be presented by invited speakers and in shorter presentations by registered speakers. The conference also includes workshops, poster sessions and panel discussions.
PUBMET conference is organized by the University of Zadar, Department of Information Sciences, Centre for Scientific Information of the Ruđer Bošković Institute, University of Zagreb, Croatian Association for Scholarly Communication, and University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine.
Dates to remember:
· abstract submission deadline: 1 May 15 May 2022 – now closed!
· abstract acceptance notification: 1 June 10 June 2022
· full paper submission deadline: 1 July 15 September 2022
· presentation submission deadline: 12 September 2022
Speakers
OAPEN Foundation
Berlin Institute of Health
University of Belgrade
Federation of Finnish Learned Societies
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Split | CROKlio
Governmental Agency for IT Development, Hungary
National and University Library in Zagreb
ICM University of Warsaw
Gdansk University of Technology Library
Poster presenters
No shelf required
University of Split School of Medicine
University of Split
TRIBE, University of Split
Juraj Dobrila University of Pula
Institute of Technical Sciences of SASA, Belgrade
Workshop leaders
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Zagreb
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mostar
University Computing Centre University of Zagreb (SRCE)
Limerick Institute of Technology
GoTriple
Ruđer Bošković Institute
Ruđer Bošković Institute
EMERALD Publishing
Preliminary conference programme
ThatCamp stands for „The Humanities And Technology Camp”. It is a so-called ,unconference‘ based on the BarCamp concept: an open, agile and spontaneous meeting where participants learn and work together by engaging in group discussions, co-working sessions, or other forms of collaborative work. What is it about? A ThatCamp has no detailed programme. After a […]
DIGITOOLS - The future of open digital education | workshop
The crisis generated by the COVID-19 pandemic has forced European universities to move their teaching activities to the online environment. Although most Higher Education Institutions have implemented E-Learning platforms years ago, the teaching staff are now experiencing difficulties in using these platforms and in creating and adapting the course content, needed to quickly adapt to […]
Science Communication Workshop: How to reach a broader audience for your research | workshop
Among many other things, the COVID-19 pandemic taught the world the importance of providing rational information to the public and fostering a scientific way of thinking among people. Therefore, communicating science is crucial if we want the public to understand the basics of science so they would be able to make informed decisions about crucial […]
Emerald Publishing - Come on in, we are OPEN | sponsor workshop
We are passionate about helping authors tell their story in a meaningful and timely way. In doing so, we are committed to providing a leading service for open research, celebrating transparency and co-creation in a way that instils trust and confidence in our communities and global audiences worldwide. We’re passionate about supporting all forms of […]
EMERALD Publishing
SESSION 1 • REDESIGNING OPEN ACCESS
MODERATORS – Gunnar Sivertsen and Pierre Mounier SHORT TALKS 10:50-11:00 GMT+2 Vanessa Proudman and Tanja Roussou ‣ A shared path to reforming rights retention in Europe 11:00-11:10 GMT+2 Delwen Franzen ‣ Obtaining self-archiving permissions at scale to realize the potential of green Open Access: A case study 11:10-11:20 GMT+2 Krzysztof Siewicz ‣ Library of Science […]
A shared path to reforming rights retention in Europe
Obtaining self-archiving permissions at scale to realize the potential of green Open Access: A case study
Library of Science – a case for the nationwide support and development of Open Access journals
The landscape of scholarly book publishing in Croatia: finding pathways for sustainable open access models
Making open access books work fairly and effectively for authors and readers: a review of non-BPC publishing models
SESSION 2 • RAISING EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION • panel discussion
MODERATORS – Mario Malički and Nicolaie Constantinescu SHORT TALKS 13:00-13:10 GMT+2 Pablo Sastrón-Toledo, Patricia Alonso-Alvarez, Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez and Elías Sanz-Casado ‣ Spanish National Plan of Science and Innovation adherence to Open Access mandates: advantages and disadvantages for scholars 13:10-13:20 GMT+2 Magdalena Szuflita-Żurawska and Anna Wałek ‣ Raising efficiency and effectiveness in scholarly communication – example […]
Spanish National Plan of Science and Innovation adherence to Open Access mandates: advantages and disadvantages for scholars
Raising efficiency and effectiveness in scholarly communication – example of the Bridge of Knowledge platform from Gdańsk University of Technology
Working towards a more connected scholarly community
SESSION 3 • FAIRNESS OF OPEN SCIENCE
MODERATORS – Ana Marušić and Ksenija Baždarić SHORT TALKS 16:30-16:40 GMT+2 Ákos Lencsés ‣ Challenges of promoting Open Science within the NI4OS-Europe project in Hungary 16:40-16:50 GMT+2 Elina Late and Janne Pölönen ‣ How do society publishers practice open science beyond open access publishing? 16:50-17:00 GMT+2 Marijana Glavica, Irena Kranjec, Janez Štebe and Sonja Bezjak […]
Challenges of promoting Open Science within the NI4OS-Europe project in Hungary
How do society publishers practice open science beyond open access publishing?
Improving research data citation and access to primary data used in scientific publications
SESSION 4 • POTENTIALS OF PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT IN SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISM
MODERATORS – Miro Pušnik and Iryna Kuchma SHORT TALKS 9:30-9:40 GMT+2 Alisa Martek, Dorja Mučnjak and Dolores Mumelaš ‣ Citizen Science in Europe – challenges in conducting Citizen Science activities in cooperation with university and public libraries 9:40-9:50 GMT+2 Uroš Kunaver and Tea Romić ‣ National Contact Point for Citizen Science in University Library 9:50-11:00 […]
Citizen Science in Europe – challenges in conducting Citizen Science activities in cooperation with university and public libraries
National Contact Point for Citizen Science in University Library
SESSION 5 • ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF RESEARCH PROCESS, RESEARCH OUTPUTS AND PUBLICATION CHANNELS
MODERATORS – Pablo de Castro and Jadranka Stojanovski SHORT TALKS 12:30-12:40 GMT+2 Niels Stern ‣ Developing a peer review information service for monographs together with open access book publishers 12:40-12:50 GMT+2 Vladimir Otašević ‣ The usage of open infrastructures for alternative assessing the quality of research outputs 12:50-13:00 GMT+2 Radovan Vrana ‣ The incentives and […]
Developing a peer review information service for monographs together with open access book publishers
The usage of open infrastructures for alternative assessing the quality of research outputs
The incentives and rewards in scholarly communication: the good, the bad and the possible
Elucidating the effects of peer review by conducting a living synthesis of studies on manuscript changes
SESSION 6 • MEDIA VISIBILITY AS A DRIVER OF SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT • panel discussion
moderator: Dalibor Jakus